SAMEER JAIN
Uttam Distilleries Limited – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“A) Issue a writ of mandamus or in the nature thereof or any other writ, order or direction to the RIICO to implement the decision of Cabinet and allowed the petitioner company to construct the distillery and Bottelling Plant, at plot no. SP-1, Sare-Khurdh, Bhiwadi District Alwar and commence its product.
B) Issue a writ of Certiorari in the nature thereof or any other writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside Impugned Order-I dated 8.4.2010 (Annexure-28), Impugned Order-II dated 22.06.2010 (Annexure-30), Impugned Order-III dated 07.09.2010 (Annexure-32) and Impugned Order-IV dated 19.11.2010 (Annexure-34) passed by the Respondent.
C) Pass any other or further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”
FACTS/BACKGROUND:
2. The brief and necessary facts of the case, as per the record, are as follows:
i. The petitioner-company applied for permission to establish a Distillery, Brewery and Bottling Plant at RIICO, Bhiwadi, Unit-II, District Alwar (hereafter to be referred as “the Plant”). In pursuance thereof, No Objection Certificate (in s
A.V. Papayya Sastry and Ors. vs. Government of A.P. and Ors.: (2007) 4 SCC 221
Anil Bansal vs. Ashok Kumar Bansal and Ors.: (2005) 9 SCC 368
Khoday Distilleries vs. State of Karnataka reported in (1995) 1 SCC 574
S.N. Mukherjee vs. Union of India reported in AIR 1990 SC 1984
Tilokchand H.B. Motichand and Ors. vs. Munshi and Anr.: (1969) 1 SCC 110
Chandra Shashi vs. Anil Kumar Verma: (1995) 1 SCC 421
Abhyudya Sanstha vs. Union of India and Ors.: (2011) 6 SCC 145
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Narmada Bachao Andolan and Anr.: (2011) 7 SCC 639
Kalyaneshwari vs. Union of India and Anr.: (2011) 3 SCC 287
Kishore Samrite vs. State of U.P. and Ors.: (2013) 2 SCC 398
Amar Singh vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2011) 7 SCC 69
Ramjas Foundation and Anr vs. Union of India & Ors.: (2010) 14 SCC 38
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs. vs. Jagannath (Dead) by L.Rs. and Ors.: (1994) 1 SCC 1
Point of Law : In case of failure to handover the possession in time, the plot shall be deemed to have been taken into possession by the Corporation and amount shall be refunded as per rules of the c....
The withdrawal of an allotment must be justified, and reasons for administrative decisions must be valid and consistent. Natural justice principles must be upheld in administrative actions.
The court held that administrative authorities must act within legal bounds, and their inaction in issuing NOC and executing Sale Deed was arbitrary, necessitating compliance with conditions for reli....
A contracting party is bound to fulfill the conditions set forth in a lease agreement; failure to do so legitimizes cancellation of the contract by authorities, despite claims of external difficultie....
Resumption of industrial plot for non-fulfilment of terms and conditions of allotment is justified.
The court affirmed that a party cannot use writ jurisdiction to enforce contractual obligations, which must instead be pursued through appropriate civil or arbitration channels.
The court emphasized that passing of an order of cancellation of allotment was not mandatory on violation of the conditions of allotment letters, and that the petitioner's substantial compliance with....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.