Back
PANKAJ BHANDARI, BHUWAN GOYAL
Rajendra Son of Shri Chitarmal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BHUWAN GOYAL, J.
1- mDr nksuksa vihysa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr ,d gh fu.kZ; ds fo:) izLrqr gksus ls budk fuLrkj.k ,d lkFk fd;k tk jgk gSA
2- vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr jktsUnz }kjk Mh-ch- fØehuy vihy la[;k 972@2014 fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; vfrfjDr ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] pkSew] t;iqj ftyk }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 04@2009] muokuh izdj.k jktLFkku ljdkj cuke jktsUnz esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa n.Mkns'k fnukad 11-06-2014] ftlds }kjk fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr jktsUnz dks vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 302 Hkk-na-la- ds vkjksi esa nks"kfl) dj vkthou dkjkokl ,oa 1]000@& :i;s vFkZn.M rFkk vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M 03 ekg ds vfrfjDr lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gS rFkk Mh-ch- fØehuy vihy la[;k 863@2014] vihykFkhZ&jkT; ljdkj }kjk vfHk;qDr jktsUnz dks mijksDr vijk/k esa vf/kdre ltk ls nf.Mr fd;k tkdj ltk o`f) fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
3- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj ls gSa fd ih-M- 1 ifjoknh eksgu yky 'kekZ us ,d fjiksVZ ¼izn'kZ ih-&1½ fnukad 13-09-2008 dks iqfyl Fkkuk xksfoUnxढ+] ftyk t;iqj esa bl vk'k; dh ntZ djokbZ fd mldk HkkbZ Nhrjey] mldh iRuh pank nsoh o yM+ds lqjs'k o 'kqHkdj.k tks vius edku esa jgrs Fks] dy fnukad 12-09-2008 dh jkf= dks vius edku
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the provisions of the 160@1998, 302, 304ch, and 498 sections.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of sections 120, 131Mh, and 132 of the Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
