IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J.
Samaun S/o Mumtaj Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail(Interim) Application No. 1435 of 2023
Decided on : 16-02-2023
Interim Bail - NDPS Act - The court rejected the interim bail application of the petitioner, who was in custody for offenses under the NDPS Act, on the grounds of his illness, specifically kidney stone, as the petitioner failed to substantiate his claims with supporting documents.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed an interim bail application citing his kidney stone ailment and the need for immediate medical attention. He had previously been granted interim bail on three occasions for other reasons.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner failed to provide any supporting documents for his claim of suffering from kidney stone, and therefore, rejected the interim bail application.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner's claim of suffering from kidney stone warranted the grant of interim bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of supporting documents for the petitioner's claim of illness, as well as the petitioner's previous failed interim bail application based on similar grounds.
Final Decision: The court rejected the interim bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner.
ORDER :
1. The instant interim bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner Samaun S/o Mumtaj Khan who is in custody in relation to F.I.R. No.10/2019, Police Station Suratgarh District Sriganganagar for the offences under Sections 8/22, 29 of the NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is suffering from ailment of kidney stone which is at present 20.1 MM in size, thus he required immediate medical attention. He further submits that petitioner is in custody for last four years and earlier on two occasions i.e. on the count of illness of his mother, he was released on interim bail for a period of 20 days & 10 days by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 03.05.2021 and 13.01.2022 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Interim Bail Applications No.4720/2021 & 17308/2021 and during that period, his conduct was found satisfactory. Learned counsel has placed reliance on the conduct report of the petitioner as reported in order of the trial Court. He further submits that there is no likelihood of running away of petitioner from jurisdiction of the Court. He further submits that in the instant interim bail application it has been prayed that petitioner himself is suffering from kidney stone and he is advised to undergo surgery thus, he may be enlarged on interim bail for a period of 45 days for his undergoing surgery. He further submits that the petitioner will intimate the name of the hospital wherein he will be operated.
3. Aforesaid contentions are opposed by learned Public Prosecutor.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the material available on record.
5. On perusal of the record, it reveals that petitioner was allowed interim bail on three earlier occasions vide order dated 03.05.2021 for 20 days and vide order dated 13.08.2021 for 10 days and on 13.01.2022 for 15 days respectively. Last interim bail application being S.B. Criminal Misc. Interim Bail Application No.15813/2022 was filed by the petitioner on the ground that his mother is suffering from kidney stone as well as from hernia and requires urgent medical intervention but the Coordinate Bench decided the said bail application vide order dated 20.12.2022, which was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to renew the prayer for grant of interim bail if ailment aggregates in future.
6. The instant interim bail application is filed on behalf of the petitioner on the ground that he himself is suffering from kidney stone measuring 20.1 MM and advised for operation. When this Court look at the record, it is found that not a single document to this effect has been filed by the petitioner. The order passed by the learned trial Court further indicates that not a single report supporting the contentions/averments that petitioner is suffering from kidney stone was filed. Thus, the petitioner who was allowed interim bail on three occasions, but he failed to get interim bail vide Application No.15813/2022, has filed the instant interim bail application on the ground of his illness itself. The grounds so assigned are not substantiated by any document hence, this Court is of the opinion that no case for grant of interim bail to petitioner is made out.
7. As an upshot of the discussion made herein above, this Court is not inclined to entertain the interim bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the same is hereby rejected.
The court emphasized the importance of substantiating claims of illness with supporting documents when seeking interim bail.
The court denied interim bail due to lack of serious health issues as per medical reports, while ensuring the petitioner receives adequate medical treatment in custody.
The court may grant interim bail based on the health condition and medical needs of the petitioner.
The court has the discretion to grant interim bail based on humanitarian grounds, such as the illness of a family member requiring the presence and support of the accused.
The court may grant interim bail based on medical grounds without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case.
The court granted interim bail based on the genuine medical grounds for the petitioner's mother's surgery, highlighting the principle of parity with previous bail decisions.
The court granted interim bail on humanitarian grounds, emphasizing the need for emotional support and medical care for the petitioner's seriously ill father.
The court established that the grant of interim bail must consider the applicant's criminal history and the potential risk to public safety, even in light of personal hardships.
Interim bail can be granted based on the serious medical condition of a family member, emphasizing the accused's role as a caretaker.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.