IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ASHOK KUMAR GAUR, ASHUTOSH KUMAR, JJ.
Dr.Ashish Garg S/o Ramesh Chand Garg – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Higher Education – Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15154 of 2019
Decided on : 30-05-2023
Constitution of India, 1949 - Article 14 and 19 - Rajasthan Voluntary Rural Education Service Rules, 2010 - Rules 5 - Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 - Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions (Recognition, Grant-In-Aid and Service Conditions, Etc.) Rules, 1993 - Extension of Contract Demand - Screening Committee - Unreasonable - Unjustifiable - Writ petition has been filed by petitioner challenging vires of Voluntary Rural Education Service Rules, 2010 - Held, Court finds that Apex Court judgment considered earlier judgment passed case - Learned counsel petitioner has placed reliance on a judgment passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court connected review petitions were filed against order Division Bench at Principal Seat Jodhpur passed an order allowed review petitions - Writ petition lacks merit dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
By the Court
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the vires of the Rules 5(iv) of the Rajasthan Voluntary Rural Education Service Rules, 2010 (hereinafter shall be referred to as “the RVRES Rules of 2010”).
2. The consequential prayers of the petitioner, as made in the writ petition, are as follows-
(ii) to declare the petitioner entitled to the benefit of senior and selection scale from 19.01.1998 and 13.01.2003 respectively by taking into account the period of service rendered by him on the unaided post in the Non-Government Aided Educational Institution;
(iii) to direct the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to make payment of arrears of salary to the petitioner by extending the benefit of 6th Pay Commission recommendations while considering the services rendered by the petitioner on unaided post towards senior and selection scales.
3. The facts, in nutshell, of the present petition are that the petitioner was appointed initially on 19.01.1993 on the post of Lecturer in Chemistry subject in Seth Motilal PG College, Jhunjhunu which is a Non-Government Aided Educational Institution. The services of the petitioner were confirmed w.e.f. 19.01.1995.
4. The institution, in which the petitioner was working, was receiving grant-in-aid from the State Government under the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 (hereinafter shall be referred to as “the Act of 1989”) and the Rules framed thereunder i.e. the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions (Recognition, Grant-In-Aid and Service Conditions, Etc.) Rules, 1993 (hereinafter shall be referred to as “the Rules of 1993”) and the post of Lecturer in Chemistry was duly sanctioned w.e.f 01.04.1998.
5. The petitioner has pleaded that the University Grants Commission (for short “the UGC”) introduced Career Advancement Scheme (for short “the CAS”) and as such, the benefit of senior scale was granted to the petitioner w.e.f. 19.01.1998 after selection by a duly constituted Screening Committee including State Government nominee.
6. The petitioner has pleaded that after serving for five years as Lecturer in Chemistry in the senior scale from 19.01.1998, he was granted the benefit of selection scale w.e.f. 19.01.2003 again by a duly constituted Screening Committee nominated by the State Government.
7. The petitioner has pleaded that the State Government created a new service namely the Rajasthan Voluntary Rural Education Service Rules, 2010 and the petitioner had chosen to join the services in the Government Institution and he filled the option form and was absorbed in the Government Service under the RVRES Rules of 2010 on 29.07.2011 and the petitioner was relieved on 30.07.2011 and joined at the allotted College, after being relieved from the earlier Non-Government Aided Educational Institution-respondent No.4.
8. The petitioner has pleaded that vide order dated 21.02.2011 the salary of the petitioner came to be revised, in terms of Rule 5(iv) of the RVRES Rules of 2010, counting the services rendered by him only from 01.04.1998 and ignoring his services prior thereto i.e. from 19.01.1993 to 31.03.1998 and the salary of the petitioner also came to be revised, considering the grant of selection scale from 01.04.2007 instead of 19.01.2003.
9. The petitioner, feeling aggrieved by the issuance of order dated 21.02.2011, revising his salary in senior scale and selection scale and so also by the Rule 5(iv) of the RVRES Rules of 2010, assails the vires of Rule 5(iv) of the RVRES Rules of 2010 itself along with the consequential orders in the present petition.
10. The respondent-State has filed reply to the writ petition and in the preliminary submission, it has been pleaded that the order dated 21.02.2011 was issued by the respondent-4 Seth Motilal PG College, Jhunjhu
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Gurnam Kaur reported in (1989) 1 SCC 101
Prem Nath Sharma Vs. State of UP reported in (1997) 4 SCC 552
State of Gujarat Vs. R.A. Mehta reported in (2013) 3 SCC 1
State of UP & Anr. Vs. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd. & Anr. reported in (1991) 4 SCC 139.
A-One Granites Vs. State of UP & Ors. reported in (2001) 3 SCC 537.
Denial of pension to employees of aided institutions appointed prior to promulgation of Rajasthan Civil Services (Contributory) Pension Rules, 2005 at par with Government servants as per Pension Rule....
Point of Law : It is akin to doctrine of benefits and burdens which at its most basic level provides that a person taking advantage under an instrument which both grants a benefit and imposes a burde....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the 2010 Regulations provide for the counting of previous regular service for the purposes of grant of benefits under CAS, without making a....
Rule 33 of Pension Rules states as pension on absorption in or under a corporation, company or body.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the Rajasthan Voluntarily Rural Education Service Rules, 2010, specifically Rule 4 and Rule 5, in determining....
The State Government's liability for salary payments to college staff as per Section 60-E of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973, and the inability of government orders to override statutory rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.