FARJAND ALI
Vijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant criminal appeal under Section 374 CrPC has been preferred by the appellants challenging the judgment dated 27.08.1994 passed by the learned Special Judge, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Udaipur in Sessions Case No.48/1992, whereby they have been convicted and sentenced as under :
| Name of the appellant | Offence for which convicted | Sentence Awarded | Fine imposed | Default Sentence |
| Vijay Singh | Section 326 IPC | 7 Years R.I. | Rs.10,000/- | 1 Year R.I. |
| Section 324 IPC | 1 Year R.I. | Rs.1,000/- | 1 Month R.I. | |
| Section 323/34 IPC | 6 months R.I. | Rs.1,000/- | 1 Month R.I. | |
| Bhopal Singh | Section 326/34 IPC | 5 Years R.I. | Rs.5,000/- | 6 months R.I. |
| Section 324/34 IPC | 6 months R.I. | Rs.1,000/- | 1 Month R.I. | |
| Section 323 IPC | 6 months R.I. | Rs.1,000/- | 1 Month R.I |
2. Briefly stated, facts relevant and essential for disposal of the instant appeal are that on 22.05.1991 one Daulat Singh (P.W.6) submitted a report at the Police Station Bhindar, District Udaipur to the
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303
The court can exercise its inherent powers to compound non-compoundable offences based on settlement and marriage between the parties, considering the peaceful nature of the dispute and the principle....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.