Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Bhawraram, S/o. Deeparam – Appellant
Versus
Vishnaram, S/o. Devaram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
Any other order or direction which may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favor of the petitioner.”
2. Brief facts of the case, as placed before this Court by learned counsel for the petitioners, are that the respondent no.1-plaintiff instituted a suit (registered as Revenue Original Suit no.41/2008) before the Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO), Balesar on 08.04.2008 against the petitioners and the other respondents, seeking correction in the revenue records, declaration, partition and permanent injunction in respect of an ancestral proper
Clerical errors in land revenue records can be corrected to reflect true ownership, and such corrections should not be interfered with if substantiated.
The court upheld the concurrent findings of the revenue Courts and emphasized the limited jurisdiction of the court in issuing directions under a writ petition.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of not substituting the court's own conclusions for those reached by the lower courts, especially when there are concurrent findi....
A fair hearing is essential in legal proceedings; lack of opportunity renders judgments void and necessitates reconsideration.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
