AKIL KURESHI, UMA SHANKER VYAS
Union Bank of India, Jaipur, through its Authorised Officer – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AKIL KURESHI, J.
1. Central question involved in these petitions is of the validity of Regulation 9 of Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority Regulations, 2017 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Regulations of 2017’). Peripheral issues raised and consequential directions sought by the petitioners in different petitions vary. However since the validity of Regulation 9 of the Regulation of 2017 is the focal point, we have combined all these petitions for common consideration. Some of the petitions are filed by the promoters of housing projects against whom the allottees of residential units have approached RERA and in whose favour RERA has passed certain directions. Some of the petitions have been filed by the Banks who are the secured creditors of the promoters and who wish to take coercive measures under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘SARFAESI Act’) to recover their unpaid dues.
2. For convenience we may refer to facts stated in Civil Writ Petition No. 13688/2021. This petition is filed by the Union Bank of India. The petitioner has challenged the validity of Regul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.