SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 961

KULDEEP MATHUR
Sukhvinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shree Kant Verma, Advocate, Arun Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.246/2022, registered at Police Station Rawla, District Sri Ganganagar, for offences under Sections 363, 366(K), 376(2)(n) of IPC & Sections 3(A)/4, 5(L)/6 of POCSO Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the Court’s attention towards statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. which reveals that the prosecutrix had left her parental house and was living with the accused-petitioner voluntarily. The above mentioned act happened with due consent of the prosecutrix. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

3. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

4. Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top