SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 966

KULDEEP MATHUR
Sawant Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Akash Goyal, Advocate, N.S. Bhati, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - The application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.198/2022, registered at Police Station Jhanwar, District Jodhpur for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A and 376 IPC and Section 3/4 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner so also the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner drew attention of this Court towards statement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. before the competent criminal court. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case, though the petitioner and the prosecutrix were in a consensual relationship.

4. Keeping in view of the aforesaid submission along with the fact that age of the prosecutrix is between 16 to 18 years age and age of the complainant is 21 years old, the benefit of bail deserves to be granted to the accused petitioner.

5. On the contrary, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner.

6. Having considered the rival s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top