SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1395

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Prem – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rishabh Handa, Advocate, Anita Gehlot, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 71/2022, Police Station Kotwali, Nagaur, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 of I.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused Ramchandra @ Ramesh has already been enlarged on bail by this Hon'ble Court and the case of present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of the co-accused. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

6. accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top