SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1090

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Sunil Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B. Ray Bishnoi, Advocate, Rajesh Vyas, Advocate, Laxman Solanki, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.246/2021, Police Station Boranada, District Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 302/34 IPC.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after rejection of the first bail application by this Court on 16.02.2022, the statement of seven prosecution witnesses have been recorded before the trial court including PW-7 Babu Lal, who is the owner of the factory, where the incident had taken place. Learned counsel further submits that the deceased Surendra Singh was working as a contract labour at the premises of PW-7 Babu Lal, however, Dampi and Mehraj were given a contract at a lessor rate than Surendra Singh was working. Learned counsel further submits that Surendra Singh went to the factory premises of PW-7 and started fighting with Dumpy and Mehraj abusing them that why they have taken his work at a lessor rate. He further submits that the deceased along with other perso

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top