SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2650

MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Bagaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jamta Ram, Advocate, Anita Gehlot, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Madan Gopal Vyas, J. - The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.147/2022 of Police Station Bagora, District Jalore for the offences punishable under Sections 365, 384, 342, 376, & 120-B IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and no allegation is levelled against him. It is further submitted that the statement of prosecutrix was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she did not name the present petitioner. It is also submitted that the FIR was lodged after 7 days from the date of incident. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

3. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top