SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2652

MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Bhomaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pankaj Kumar Gupta, Advocate, Anita Gehlot, Advocate, Bhoop Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Madan Gopal Vyas, J. - The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.326/2022 of Police Station Pachpadra, District Barmer for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 384, 427, 435, 307, 509 IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that no injury has been caused to anyone, therefore, the offence under Section 307 IPC is not made out against the petitioner. It is also submitted that petitioner’s name is not mentioned in the FIR. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the bail application.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top