SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2654

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Madan Gopal Vyas, J.
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15855 of 2022
Decided On : 15-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Laxman Bishnoi, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate

The court has the discretion to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote:

NDPS Act - Bail Application - The court granted bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C after considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested in connection with an FIR for offences under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C, claiming false implication and stating that the recovered contraband was below commercial quantity.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, granted bail to the accused petitioner considering the totality of the facts and circumstances.

Issues: The main issue was whether the accused petitioner should be granted bail in connection with the NDPS Act offences.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Final Decision: The bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C was allowed, and the accused petitioner was directed to be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.

JUDGMENT

Madan Gopal Vyas, J. - The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.401/2022 of Police Station Dhorimanna, District Barmer for the offences punishable under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, it is prayed that the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

3. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Ashok Kumar S/o Uda Ram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 401/2022 of Police Station Dhorimanna, District Barmer provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top