SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2713

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Jai Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8623 of 2022
Decided On : 08-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Charan, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate

Headnote:

NDPS Act - Bail Application - The court granted bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested in connection with an offense under Sections 8/15 & 25 of NDPS Act. The petitioner claimed that he was not present at the time of recovery of contraband and that the contraband was recovered from a vehicle registered in his name. The petitioner had no criminal antecedents and no pending investigation.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, granted bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Issues: The issue was whether the accused petitioner should be granted bail in connection with the NDPS Act offense.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and deemed it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner.

Final Decision: The bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. was allowed, and the accused petitioner was directed to be released on bail upon executing a personal bond and providing sureties.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.28/2021 of Police Station Bhainsroadgarh, District Udaipur, for the offence punishable under Sections 8/15 & 25 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of recovery of contraband, present petitioner was not present and he is the registered owner of the vehicle from which the contraband was recovered. Counsel further submits that challan of the case was also presented against the petitioner for the offence under Section 8/25 of NDPS Act and there are no other criminal antecedents of the petitioner and now no investigation is pending. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Jai Singh S/o Anna Singh Rawat, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.28/2021 of Police Station Bhainsroadgarh, District Udaipur, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top