SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2687

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Farjand Ali, J.
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 529 of 2020
Decided On : 12-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mahaveer Bishnoi, Advocate, Gaurav Singh, Advocate

The necessity for the trial court to apply a reasoned speaking order and show reasonable belief before putting the accused for trial under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act.

Headnote:

Lack of Application of Mind - Criminal Appeal - The court set aside the order framing charge under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act, emphasizing the necessity for the trial court to apply a reasoned speaking order and show reasonable belief before putting the accused for trial.

Fact of the Case:

The criminal appeal is against the order framing charge under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act, where the court found that the trial court did not apply the requisite application of mind and did not provide a reasoned speaking order.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the order and remanded the matter back to the trial court to pass a reasoned speaking order without being influenced by the previous order.

Issues: Lack of application of mind by the trial court in passing the order framing charge under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The necessity for the trial court to apply a reasoned speaking order and show reasonable belief before putting the accused for trial.

Final Decision: The appeal is allowed, and the order framing charge is set aside, with the matter remanded back to the trial court.

JUDGMENT

Farjand Ali, J. - Despite service, no one is present on behalf of the respondent No.2.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

3. This criminal appeal is directed against the order dated 6.2.2020 passed by learned Special Judge SC/ST Act (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Sriganganagar, ("the trial court") in Sessions Case No.157/2018 framing charge against the appellant for the offence under Section 3 (1) (x) of the SC/ST Act.

4. A perusal of the order dated 6.2.2020 reflects that the requisite application of mind has not been applied in the matter by the learned trial court while passing the order framing charge. Though meticulous appreciation of evidence is not warranted at this stage, yet it is expected from the learned trial court to aver the facts necessary to show the reasonable belief of the trial court to put the accused for trial.

5. In this view of the matter, the order impugned dated 6.2.2020 passed by the trial court in Sessions Case No. 157/2018 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the learned trial court to pass a reasoned speaking order without being influenced by this order.

6. The appeal is allowed in the above terms. Stay application also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top