SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2728

FARJAND ALI
Mangi Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C.Joshi, Advocate, Shardul Singh, Advocate, Gaurav Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Farjand Ali, J. - By way of filing the instant criminal appeal, challenge has been made to the order dated 22.1.2018 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Hanumangarh in Complaint Case No.70/2017, whereby learned Court below has declined to take cognizance of the offence.

2. Bereft of elaborate details, the facts necessary for disposal of the case are that upon a complaint moved by the appellant, the Court below examined him under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and sent the matter under Section 202 Cr.P.C. to the police seeking assistance in inquiry. After receipt of the report from the police under Section 202 Cr.P.C., no other witness was examined in the inquiry and no further evidence has been adduced. The learned Court below has dealt with all the legal and factual aspects of the matter and passed the order impugned dated 22.1.2018.

3. I see no reason for interference in the order impugned, as the same is well reasoned and based on cogent grounds.

4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top