Back
2022 Supreme(Raj) 2695
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Dinesh Mehta, J.
Ravindra Solanki – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4177 of 2022
Decided On : 12-12-2022
Important Points
Subject
Employment Law - Illegal Dispensation of Engagement
Headnote
Illegal Dispensation - Employment Dispute - The court directed the petitioner to file a representation within two weeks, and the competent authority of the respondents to consider and decide the representation in accordance with the law within four weeks to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner's grievance.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, claiming to be a Computer Operator with the respondents, alleged illegal dispensation of his engagement.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the petitioner to file a representation within two weeks, and the competent authority of the respondents to consider and decide the representation in accordance with the law within four weeks to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner's grievance.
Issues: Illegal dispensation of engagement, expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for expeditious redressal of the petitioner's grievance and directed the competent authority to consider and decide the representation in accordance with the law.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition with the aforementioned directions and also disposed of the stay application accordingly.
Dilip Singh Rathore, Advocate, Vrinda Samdani, Advocate, Vandana Bhansali, Advocate
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Mehta, J. - The petitioner, who claims to be working as Computer Operator with the respondents, has approached this Court with a grievance that the respondents have dispensed with his engagement illegally.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the competent authority of the respondents to consider his representation expeditiously.
In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation within a period of two weeks along with certified copy of the order instant.
3. In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the competent authority of respondents shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks.
4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.
5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
