Back
DINESH MEHTA
Ram Swarup – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Mehta, J. - Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is identical to the controversy decided by this Court in the case of Jagdish Bhanoda Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (judgment dated 29.07.2009), which has attained finality till the Supreme Court.
2. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider his representation (which he would be filing within two weeks) expeditiously.
3. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation along with certified copy of the order instant and photocopies of the judgments which they wish to rely upon.
4. On receipt of the representation, competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law as early as possible, preferably within a period of 12 weeks of the date of receiving the representation.
5. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representa
The court established that while it can direct the consideration of representations, it does not dictate the outcome of such considerations.
The court directed the competent authority to consider the petitioners' representation in accordance with law and prior judgment, emphasizing expeditious but unbiased consideration.
The court emphasized the need for expeditious redressal of the petitioners' grievance.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued unless the petitioner has first approached the appropriate administrative authority to resolve their grievances.
The court established that representations regarding employment vacancies must be considered expeditiously by the competent authority, adhering to legal standards.
The legal principle established is that authorities must consider representations regarding vacancies in a timely manner, ensuring adherence to legal standards without bias in decision-making.
The legal principle established is that authorities must consider representations regarding employment vacancies in a timely manner, ensuring adherence to legal processes without bias.
The legal principle established is that authorities must consider representations regarding vacancies in a timely manner, ensuring adherence to lawful procedures without bias.
The court established that timely consideration of representations regarding employment vacancies is essential, and decisions must be made in accordance with the law without bias.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
