SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2709

SANDEEP MEHTA, KULDEEP MATHUR
Kuntesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Manisha Sharma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. D.S. Gharsana, for the Appellant; Mr. Hardik Gautam, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The present misc. appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 is directed against the order dated 01.03.2017 passed by the Family Court No.1, Bikaner (hereinafter referred to as ’Family Court’) whereby the application preferred by appellanthusband under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC praying to set aside ex parte decree dated 06.05.2016 was rejected.

2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that appellant got married to the respondent-wife on 18.11.2000. The couple has one daughter and one son from the said marriage. The relationship between the parties did not remain cordial. Thus, a petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act was filed by the appellant on the ground of cruelty against respondent-wife before Family Court No.1, Bikaner. The Family Court directed appellant to produce witnesses in support of his petition on 22.04.2014. However, the appellant failed to produce witness for examination on the aforesaid date. The Family Court extended 16 opportunities to the appellant to produce witnesses. In fact, appellant never appeared before Family Court after 13.05.2011. The Family Court on 03.04.2016 allowed last opportunity in favour of the appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top