IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Karnail Singh & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1919 of 2022, S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 1786 of 2022
Decided On : 08-12-2022
Bail - SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - The court set aside the orders rejecting the bail applications and granted bail to the accused-appellants.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants filed appeals under Section 14-A of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking bail in connection with FIR No. 139/2022 for various offenses.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the orders rejecting the bail applications cannot be sustained and deserve to be set aside, granting bail to the accused-appellants.
Issues: The main issue was the rejection of the bail applications filed on behalf of the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the entirety of facts and circumstances, and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, concluded that the orders rejecting the bail applications cannot be sustained.
Final Decision: Both the appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside, granting bail to the accused-appellants.
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - These two appeals have been filed under Section 14-A of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, on behalf of the appellants, who are in custody in connection with FIR No. 139/2022, Police Station Muklawa, District Sri Ganganagar, for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 307, 34 of IPC, Sections 3(1)(R), 3(1)(S) and 3(2)(VA) of SC/ST Act against the orders dated 4.11.2022 and 7.11.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, Scheduled Caste / Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Sri Ganganagar whereby, the bail applications preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellants were rejected.
2. Counsel for the appellants submits that the injured received grievous injuries on their non-vital parts of the body and the accused-appellants are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Counsel further submits that the learned court below has grossly erred in law and facts as well in declining to release the appellants on bail. Therefore, it is prayed that the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellants.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor as also learned counsel for the respondent have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
4. Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that the orders rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellants, cannot be sustained and deserve to be set aside.
5. Consequently, both the appeals are allowed. The impugned orders dated 4.11.2022 and 7.11.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Sri Ganganagar are set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellants (1) Karnail Singh S/o Shri Jeet Singh; and (2) Gurtej Singh S/o Shri Vakil Singh, arrested in connection with FIR No. 139/2022, Police Station Muklawa, District Sri Ganganagar, shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- each and two surety bonds of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the rejection of bail applications can be set aside if found unsustainable.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the nature of injuries and the length of the trial, as per the provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
The court's decision was influenced by the consideration of the fact of compromise and the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case in setting aside the order rejecting the bail application an....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the rejection of bail applications under the SC/ST Act and IPC offenses should be based on specific allegations and the severity of injuries.
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the circumstances of the case, including the nature of the offenses and the stage of the trial.
The court established that the rejection of bail must be justified by substantial reasons, particularly considering the severity of injuries and the duration of custody.
The court established that the rejection of bail must be justified by substantial reasons, and similar cases should be treated equally under the law.
The court established that the rejection of bail must be justified by substantial reasons, particularly when similar cases have resulted in bail being granted.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.