SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2711

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Karnail Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Himmat Jagga, Advocate, Anita Gehlot, Advocate, Kuldeep Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - These two appeals have been filed under Section 14-A of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, on behalf of the appellants, who are in custody in connection with FIR No. 139/2022, Police Station Muklawa, District Sri Ganganagar, for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 307, 34 of IPC, Sections 3(1)(R), 3(1)(S) and 3(2)(VA) of SC/ST Act against the orders dated 4.11.2022 and 7.11.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, Scheduled Caste / Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Sri Ganganagar whereby, the bail applications preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellants were rejected.

2. Counsel for the appellants submits that the injured received grievous injuries on their non-vital parts of the body and the accused-appellants are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Counsel further submits that the learned court below has grossly erred in law and facts as well in declining to release the appellants on bail. Therefore, it is prayed that the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellants.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor as also learned counsel for the respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top