IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Pushp Raj Singh @ Pushpendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1761 of 2022
Decided On : 07-12-2022
Bail - SC/ST (PA) Act - The court allowed the appeal and set aside the order rejecting the bail application, granting bail to the accused-appellant.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 14-A of SC/ST (PA) Act against the rejection of his bail application in connection with FIR No.59/2022 for various offenses.
Finding of the Court:
The court, after considering the arguments and the entirety of facts and circumstances, concluded that the order rejecting the bail application cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside.
Issues: The main issue was the rejection of the bail application filed on behalf of the appellant, who was in custody for various offenses.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the fact that specific allegations for committing rape were leveled against the co-accused, while no specific allegations were leveled against the present appellant. The court also considered the lengthy trial process and the absence of pending investigation.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and ordered the release of the accused-appellant on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
2. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-A of SC/ST (PA) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.59/2022, Police Station Sabla, District Dungarpur for the offences under Section 366, 376, 376(2)(h), 344 of IPC and Section 3(2)(Va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocity) Act against the order dated 03.11.2022 passed by learned Special Judge, Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Dungarpur whereby the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.
3. Counsel for the appellant submits that according to the statement of prosecutrix, specific allegation for committing rape has been levelled against the co-accused Dinesh and present appellant was merely accompanied him in the alleged crime. Counsel further submits that no allegation has been levelled against the present appellant. Challan of the case has already been presented and now no investigation is pending. The accused-appellant is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that the order rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellant, cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside.
5. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 03.11.2022 passed by learned Special Judge, Schedule Caste & Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Dungarpur is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Pushp Raj Singh @ Pushpendra Singh S/o Joravaar Singh, arrested in connection with FIR No.59/2022, Police Station Sabla, District Dungarpur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The court's decision was influenced by the specific allegations against the co-accused and the absence of specific allegations against the present appellant, along with the consideration of the lengt....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the circumstances of the case, including the prosecutrix willingly residing with the accused appellant and later filing a false FIR due to fam....
The court's decision was influenced by the change in the prosecutrix's statement and the expected lengthy trial duration in granting bail to the accused-appellant.
The court's decision was influenced by the provisions of Section 14-A(1) of SC/ST (PA) Act, which allowed for the grant of bail to the accused-appellant.
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the consideration of the entirety of facts and circumstances available on record, highlighting the importance of a thorough review of the case before m....
The court reaffirmed that bail under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act requires careful consideration of the seriousness of the allegations and the evidence presented, particularly in cases in....
The court has the discretion to set aside the rejection of a bail application if it deems that the order cannot be sustained based on the facts and circumstances of the case.
The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the bail provisions under the SC/ST Act and the consideration of the circumstances and arguments presented.
The court considered the contradictions in the statements of the prosecutrix and the anticipated lengthy trial period as grounds for granting bail to the accused-appellant.
The court established that the age of the prosecutrix and the completion of the investigation are significant factors in determining bail under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.