SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2755

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Tanveer Pathan @ Babu Pathan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kalu Ram Bhati, Advocate, S.D. Chavariya, Advocate, N.S. Bhati, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - An application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the counsel for the petitioner for extension of interim bail period for a period of thirty days.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court vide order dated 20.10.2022 granted interim bail to the petitioner for a period of 30 days on the ground of ailment of his father. Counsel further submits that now the condition of the father of the petitioner is serious and the doctors have advised him to operate his father, therefore, on this ground the period of interim bail granted by this Court may kindly be extended.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits a report received from the concerned Medical Board, in which it has been mentioned that petitioner’s father is suffering from Blood Cancer and he is referred to higher center for further treatment.

4. I have considered the arguments and carefully gone through the material available on record.

5. As per the report submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor, the condition of the father of the petitioner is serious, therefore, the period of interim bail, which was granted by this Court vide order dated 20.10.2022, is further extended for a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top