IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
Mansur Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Shabnam Bano – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1339/2019
Decided On : 14-11-2022
Maintenance - Family Court Act - The court upheld the enhancement of maintenance amount for the wife and daughter of the petitioner, considering inflation and the costs of raising a child. The court found no legal infirmity in the impugned order and dismissed the petition.
Fact of the Case:
The wife and daughter of the petitioner filed an application for enhancement of maintenance amount under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The court had initially awarded Rs. 5,000 to the respondents, which was later sought to be increased to Rs. 8,000.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the enhancement of maintenance amount was justified due to inflation and the costs of raising a child. It upheld the impugned order and dismissed the petition.
Issues: The main issue was the enhancement of maintenance amount for the respondents, considering the petitioner's income and financial obligations.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the inflation and the costs of raising a child as valid reasons for the enhancement of maintenance amount. It also took into account the petitioner's income and financial obligations.
Final Decision: The court upheld the impugned order and dismissed the petition, finding no legal infirmity in the order.
Order
1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner, even in the second round.
2. This Criminal Revision Petition under Section 19 (4) Family Courts Act, 1984 has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:-
"It is therefore, humbly prayed that the revision petition may kindly be allowed and order dated 20-08-2019 in criminal misc. case no. 479/2018 passed by learned Family Court No. 1, Bikaner, awarding increased maintenance amount, may kindly be quashed and set-aside and the application filed by the respondents may kindly be dismissed."
3. As the pleaded facts and the record would reveal, the respondents, respondent no. 1 i.e. wife of the petitioner and respondent no.2 i.e. daughter of the petitioner and respondent no. 1, preferred an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. before the learned Court below claiming maintenance from the petitioner; and a total amount of Rs. 5,000/- was awarded to them; Rs. 2,500 to each of the respondents. Subsequently, by way of an application under Section 127 Cr.P.C., enhancement of the maintenance amount , to 8,000/- for each of the respondents i.e. a total of Rs. 16,000/-, was sought by the respondents stating that the petitioner is a government servant earning a salary of Rs. 37,916/- per month. That the present petitioner filed a reply to the enhancement application, stating that after certain deductions were made from his salary, he earned an amount of Rs. 24, 591/- per month, from which he was also making certain payments towards instalments of Rs. 11,900/-. That after making the payment of Rs. 5,000/- he is left with only Rs. 7,691/- in hand.
4. It was further pleaded that the learned Court below has erred in allowing the Section 127 Cr.P.C. application of the respondents for an enhancement of the maintenance amount, whereby the maintenance amount was increased from Rs. 2,500/- to Rs. 3,250/- for each of the respondents, totaling an amount of Rs. 7,500/- per month. Vide the impugned order, it was further directed that the petitioner would be liable to pay the said amount of enhanced maintenance at an increasing rate of 10% per year from 01-08-2019 to respondent no. 1 for lifetime, and to respondent no. 2 until she got married alongwith the pending arrears towards maintenance to the respondents.
5. It was also pleaded that the petitioner’s sister is also financially dependent on him.
6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the learned Court below has rightly passed the impugned order, after taking into due consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, and the evidences placed on the record. That, the averments made on behalf of the petitioner herein were also duly considered by the learned Court below, before enhancing the amount of maintenance awarded the respondents.
7. Heard learned counsel for the parties as well as perused the record of the case.
8. This Court observes that the maintenance amount awarded to the respondents vide the S.125 Cr.P.C. application was allowed in the year 2013, whereby an amount of Rs. 5,000 was awarded to the present respondents. And that, the application for enhancement, under Section 127 Cr.P.C. was brought before the learned Court below after about 6 years, in the year 2019.
9. This Court further observes that the learned Court below, vide the impugned order, has rightly noted that since 2013 owing to the inflation, costs of raising a child, among other things, reflected merit in the application for enhancement of maintenance preferred by the respondents.
10. This Court also observes that the learned Court below has, while increasing the maintenance amount of the respondents, duly considered the averments made on behalf of the petitioner herein, regarding certain deductions and payments towards installments.
11. This Court thus finds that the learned Court below has rightly passed the impugned order, ordering a fair enhancement of amount Rs. 750/- towards each of the respondents, increasing th
AI
The court determined that a spouse's maintenance allowance can be enhanced based on the applicant's affordability and living conditions of the respondent.
three children are under the custody of their mother/ petitioner. Since the petitioner is a guardian of their children she has to maintain the education and marriage of the children etc. Further, the....
A court may enhance the maintenance amount if there's proven change in circumstances, and previous settlements must be substantiated with evidence.
A husband's obligation to maintain his wife is a continuing duty that can be adjusted based on substantial changes in financial circumstances, as defined under Sections 125 and 127 of the Code of Cri....
Maintenance under the Cr.P.C. is extendable to adult daughters until marriage, ensuring their financial support despite age.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the maintenance awarded should be just and reasonable, commensurate with the financial status of the husband and the wife's ability to maintai....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.