Rakesh Kumar vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 1237

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 1237

RAJ BEER SINGH
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Syed Mohammad Abbas Abdy, Ranjeet Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

(Raj Beer Singh, J.)

1. Both the above mentioned criminal revisions have been preferred against one and the same impugned order between the same parties and thus, both the revisions are being decided together by this common judgment.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned AGA for the State.

3. The Criminal Revision No.3043 of 2021 has been preferred by the revisionist/husband against the judgment and order dated 08.09.2021, passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge Family Court, Room No.3, Ghaziabad in Misc. Case No.129 of 2020 (Smt. Lata Rani Vs. Rakesh Kumar), under Section 127 Cr.P.C, whereby the maintenance granted to the opposite party No.2 earlier, has been enhanced from Rs.3,000/-per month to Rs.6,000/-per month. The criminal revision No.2680 of 2021 has been filed by the revisionist/wife against the same order for enhancement of maintenance amount granted by the Family Court.

4. Learned counsel for the revisionist/husband (opposite party in criminal revision No.2680 of 2021) has argued that the impugned order is against facts and law and thus, liable to be set aside. Earlier the opposite party No.2. has filed a case under Section 125 CrPC and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document