SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2843

SUDESH BANSAL
Pankhya – Appellant
Versus
Prabhu Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Tarun Jain, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

1. The instant second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by appellant-defendant, assailing the judgment and decree dated 11.05.2015, passed in Civil Regular Appeal No.414/2009 (33/01) by the Court of Additional District Judge, Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan), affirming the judgment and decree dated 02.06.2001, passed in Civil Suit No.12/1998 by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate, Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur, whereby and whereunder respondent-plaintiff’s suit for prohibitory and mandatory injunction has been decreed on merits in following manner:

^^okn oknh fo:) izfroknhx.k okLrs vkns'kkRed LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk dk vakf'kd :i ls Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'kkRed fu"ks/kkKk ls ikcan fd;k tkrk gS o okn ds layXu utjh uD'ks es ,-ch-lh-Mh- ekdZ LFkku ls Vkijh] iRFkj o vU; dksbZ Hkh O;o/kku ogka ij ls gVkys o 12 QhV jkLrs esa dksbZ vojks/k mRiUu gks rks mls gVkys rFkk LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk ls ikcan fd;k tkrk gS fd oknh ds vkxs jkLrk pkSd dh iMr Hkwfe esa O;o/kku dks gVkys mijkar mlds mi;ksx miHkksx es u Loa; ck/kk mRiUu djs u gh fdlh vU; us djokosA ekeys dh ifjfLFkfr es i{kdkjku eqdnek lEca/h O; viuk viuk ogu djsaxsA rnuqlkj

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top