SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2943

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Laxman Das – Appellant
Versus
Ram Karan Heda – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sunit Kumar Awasthi, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

1. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 06.01.2022 passed by the learned Rent Tribunal, Beawar, District Ajmer whereby, an application filed by the petitioner/non-applicant/tenant under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, has been dismissed.

2. The facts in brief are that the respondent/applicant filed an eviction application against the petitioner under Section 9 of Rajasthan Rent Control Act 2001 (for brevity, ’the Act of 2001’) seeking eviction on the ground of reasonable and bonafide necessity. The petitioner filed his reply to the application on 14.06.2018. After commencement of trial, he moved an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC seeking an amendment in the reply incorporating the facts that he has deposited a sum of Rs.9 lacs as security with the respondent at the time of taking premises on rent, the premises were not required by the petitioner as per his statement, no rent was due and the respondent has other properties available to him. The application has been dismissed by the learned Rent Tribunal vide its order dated 06.01.2022, impugned herein.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, drawing attention of this C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top