Naru Lal vs State - 2022 Supreme(Raj) 2976

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2976

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Naru Lal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Chaitanya Gahlot, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. SS Rajpurohit, PP, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The matter pertains to an incident which occurred in the year 1999 and the present criminal revision has been pending since the year 2006.

2. This criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. has been preferred against the judgment dated 16.06.2006 passed by learned learned Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Rajsamand in Criminal Appeal No.16/2006, whereby the judgment dated 20.05.2005 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Kumbhalgarh, District Rajsamand in Criminal Reguar Case No.2/2000 convicting the revisionist-petitioner was upheld. The petitioner was convicted for the offences under Sections 279 and 304-A of IPC & Section 134/187 M.V. Act and was sentenced as under:-

Sections	Sentence
279 IPC	Two months' S.I. and a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of which, he was ordered to undergo further ten days additional S.I.
304-A IPC	One year's S.I. and a fine of Rs.2000/-, in default of payment of which, he was ordered to undergo further twenty days' additional S.I.
134/187 M.V. Act	Imposed a fine of Rs.250/-, in default of payment of which, he was ordered to undergo further three days' S.I.

3. Learned counsel fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2976

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATINaru Lal – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Naru Lal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent