SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 917

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL, J
Raju @ Rajuddin S/O Shri Razzak Mev By Caste Mev – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Azad Ahmed, Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP

Table of Content
1. principles of sentencing (Para 11 , 12)
2. modification of sentence (Para 13 , 14 , 15)

Order :

2. Facts of the case in short are that on the basis of the written report (Ex.P/1 submitted by complainant- Seetaram with respect to an incident, which occurred on 07.05.2014, F.I.R. No. 398/2014 was registered at Police Station Mathura Gate District Bharatpur for the offence under Section 379 of I.P.C. After conclusion of investigation, police submitted charge-sheet against accused- petitioner for the offences under Sections 379 & 411 of I.P.C. The trial court framed charges for the aforesaid offences and trial was commenced. After conclusion of trial, the trial court passed judgment and order of sentence dated 05.02.2016 whereby accused-petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 379 of I.P.C. as stated above. Aggrieved by judgment of conviction and sentence dated 05.02.2016, accused- petitioner preferred an appeal before the learned appellate court, which passed the Judgment & Order dated 04.12.2019 partly allowing the appeal and while affirming conviction of accused petitioner modifying the order of sentence passed by the trial court. Hence, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top