SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 3030

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Sameer Jain, J.
Babulal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through PP – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11949/2022
Decided On : 08-09-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ashvin Garg, for the Appellant; Mr. Atul Sharma, PP, for the Respondent

The court considered the consensual relationship between the victim and the accused-applicant, the likelihood of a long trial, and the fact that the victim was a major lady in granting bail to the accused-applicant.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Consensual Relationship - The court granted bail to the accused-applicant based on the consensual relationship between the victim and himself, as reflected in the victim's 164 statement and the statement of the landlord. The court considered the fact that the victim was a major lady and that the trial would likely take long, and concluded that no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-applicant in custody till the conclusion of the trial.

Fact of the Case:

The accused-applicant filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.239/2022 for offences under Sections 366, 344, 328, 376(2)(n) of IPC and under Section 11/12 of POCSO Act, 2012. The accused-applicant claimed a consensual relationship with the victim, which was supported by the victim's 164 statement and the statement of the landlord.

Finding of the Court:

The court granted bail to the accused-applicant, considering the consensual relationship between the victim and himself, the fact that the victim was a major lady, and the likelihood of a long trial. The court deemed it appropriate to grant bail without commenting on the merits/demerits of the case.

Issues: Bail Application, Consensual Relationship, Length of Trial

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the consensual relationship between the victim and the accused-applicant, as reflected in the victim's 164 statement and the statement of the landlord, and the likelihood of a long trial.

Final Decision: The bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was allowed, and the accused-applicant was ordered to be enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

ORDER

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.239/2022 registered at Police Station Nasirabad Sadar District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 366, 344, 328, 376(2)(n) of IPC and under Section 11/12 of POCSO Act, 2012.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the accused-applicant is falsely implicated in the matter. There was a consensual relationship between the victim and himself. They have stayed together, with consensus, for about 28 days. The same is also reflected in 164 statement of the victim. During the said tenure, they stayed in a rented accommodation. Statement of landlord has also been recorded, which bears testimony to the said fact. Learned counsel has further submitted that they even stayed in a hotel for few days and the victim was accompanying the accused-applicant out of her own will. Learned counsel contends that it was only on account of Missing Persons Report filed by husband of the complainant that the present case has been initiated.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. Considering the arguments advanced by both the sides, considering the fact that the victim is a major lady who herself stated in 164 Cr.P.C. statement that she was living in a rental house with the accused-applicant for approximately a month; that charge-sheet has been filed in the matter; that conclusion of the trial will likely take long and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping accused-applicant in custody till conclusion of trial, and looking to overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the accused-applicant.

5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-applicant Babulal S/o Shri Ramnath shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top