SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 3030

SAMEER JAIN
Babulal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through PP – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ashvin Garg, for the Appellant; Mr. Atul Sharma, PP, for the Respondent

ORDER

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.239/2022 registered at Police Station Nasirabad Sadar District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 366, 344, 328, 376(2)(n) of IPC and under Section 11/12 of POCSO Act, 2012.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the accused-applicant is falsely implicated in the matter. There was a consensual relationship between the victim and himself. They have stayed together, with consensus, for about 28 days. The same is also reflected in 164 statement of the victim. During the said tenure, they stayed in a rented accommodation. Statement of landlord has also been recorded, which bears testimony to the said fact. Learned counsel has further submitted that they even stayed in a hotel for few days and the victim was accompanying the accused-applicant out of her own will. Learned counsel contends that it was only on account of Missing Persons Report filed by husband of the complainant that the present case has been initiated.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top