SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1045

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Veena Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pradeep Shah, Advocate, Geeta Panpaliya, Advocate, S.K. Mehar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in connection with the FIR No. 178/2022 registered at Police Station Raniwada, District Jalore for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 365, 366, 343, 376(2)(n) and 376-D of IPC.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that initially a missing person report was lodged by the father of the prosecutrix, thereafter, she was recovered by the police from Manali, Himachal Pradesh. Thereafter, her statement was recorded, in which she admitted that she went alongwith the petitioner and roamed with the petitioner at so many places. In the statement recorded under Section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C., prosecutrix admitted that she roamed with the petitioner at so many places and during this period she did not raise any hue and cry. Counsel submits that prosecutrix was major and if anything happened that was happened with the consent of the prosecutrix. Challan of the case has been presented and no investigation is pending against the petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be conclu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top