Back
NUPUR BHATI
Lr’s of Surajmal Soni – Appellant
Versus
Rent Tribunal Bikaner – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:-
Any other order favourable to the petitioner may also be passed.”
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner has a residential house at Gangashahar, Bikaner in which there are three shops and out of those three shops one shop was rented out by the petitioner to respondent No.3 Kishan Lal on 20.02.1982 for the purpose of opening a barber shop and also for doing the business of repairing radio and watches and, thus, the rent-deed dated 20.02.1982 was executed between the petitioner’s mother Smt Asha Devi and Respondent No.3. Also as per the rent-deed dated 20.02.1982, the tenancy was to continue for three month
Tenants can be evicted for using premises inconsistently with tenancy purpose, supported by sufficient evidence from the landlord.
: Court can always lift such veil and see real purpose of filing of suit. Section 18 of the Rent Control Act of 2001 admittedly bars the jurisdiction of any Civil Court in the matters relating to ten....
The landlord-tenant relationship, the landlord's bona fide need, and the rent amount were key legal principles established in the judgment.
Section 25 empowers the Rent Controller to summon and enforce the attendance of witnesses and to compel the production of evidence as the Court is empowered under CPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
