PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Deen Giri S/o Bhagwan Giri – Appellant
Versus
Prem Bhargav S/o Babulal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
b.) That if during these proceeding, if commissioner report may be brought before learned court below, then same may be declared illegal and may not be allowed to be used while determining the lis between the parties
c.) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, it is humbly prayed that the encroachment done by the Respondent shall be removed and further restrain to do any act of encroachment and status quo be maintained; and
d.) Any other order which may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the Petitioner and Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner.”
2. Brief facts of the case, as placed before this Court by learned counsel of the petitioner, are that the petitioner instituted a suit for permanent and pe
The High Court’s supervisory power under Article 227 can only be exercised to correct grave errors; dismissal of Advocate Commissioner application upheld as lawful.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of a Commissioner for local investigation should only be done for convenience and after considering the evidence produced b....
The appointment of a Commissioner can be necessary to clarify facts in cases of land encroachment.
The discretionary nature of relief under Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and the limited scope for entertaining a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Appointment of Commissioner in a matter concerning illegal encroachment is justified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.