VISHAL MISHRA
Girvardhari Awasthi – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Superintendent West Central Railway, Bhopal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vishal Mishra, J.
1. With the consent of parties, the matter is heard finally.
2. Present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 22.9.2020 passed in Case No. RCS 65-A/2019 by III Civil Judge, Class II, Vidisha whereby, the learned trial court without there being any prayer of any of the parties in the suit has ordered for appointment of Commissioner even prior to commencement of evidence of the plaintiff.
3. The plaintiff/petitioner claiming himself to be owner and in possession of the house ad-measuring 600 sqft situated in Sherpura Mohalla, Near Railway Station Vidisha has instituted a suit for permanent injunction and prayed that the defendants be restrained from making any interference in title and possession of the house and further be restrained from dismantling the house alleging it to be encroachment over the land of the railway. Along with plaint an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC has been filed which upon oral submissions of the counsel for the defendants, was not pressed by the plaintiffs. The respondents filed written statement and reply to the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CP
Ashok Parwat Vs. Sudarshan and others
Haryana WAQF Board Vs. Shanti Sarup and Ors.
Jaswant S/o. Kashi Ram Yadav Vs. Deen Dayal
Rahees Khan and Others Vs. Pradeep and Others
Suryabhan Singh Vs. State of M.P. and others
Shalini Shyam Shetty Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil (2010) 8 SCC 329
Shivkumar Sharma and Others Vs. Sukhdev Lal and Others reported in 2016 RN 347
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.