Back
YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Shyokat Ali, S/o. Shri Bag Ali – Appellant
Versus
Firm Nourangrai Brijlal, through Proprietor Shyam Sunder S/o Gaurishankar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1- ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph us ;g ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk 482 lhvkj-ih-lh- v/khuLFk U;k;ky; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] uksgj] ftyk guqekuxढ+ ds vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 17-05-2022 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh xbZ gSA
2- la{ksi esa ekeys ds rF; bl izdkj ls gSa fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa QeZ uksjax jk; c`tyky cuke ';ksdr vyh ds vuoku ls /kkjk 138 ,u-vkbZ- ,DV dk ekeyk yafcr gSA ftlesa cgl vafre ds LVst ij izR;FkhZ }kjk izkFkZuk&i= vUrxZr /kkjk 311 lhvkj-ih-lh- izLrqr dj QeZ dk jftLVªs'ku izek.k&i= lk{; esa vkdj fjdkWMZ ij ykus dh vuqefr gsrq fuosnu djus ij izkFkZuk&i= vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 17-05-2022 }kjk 10]000@& :i;s dh dksLV ij Lohdkj fd;k x;k] ftlls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
3- cgl lquh xbZA
4- fo}ku vf/koDrk fuxjkuhdrkZ }kjk esjk /;ku bl U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar Pramendra Kumar Jaluthariya Vs. Sumerchand Jaluthariya, 2019 (1) Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 391 dh vksj vkdf"kZr djrs gq, ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd izdj.k cgl vafre dh LVst ij fnukad 07-02-2020 dks fu;r Fkk] ftl ij vafre cgl lquh xbZ vkSj iqu% fnukad 04-03-2022 dks cgl lquh xbZ] mlds i'pkr vkosnu izLrqr fd;k x;k gS tks Lo;a dh lk{; ds 42 ekg ckn Lacuna fulfill djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA tks izkFkZuk&i= nsjhuk is'k djus ls izkFkZuk&i= [kk
The court emphasized that successive petitions under Section 482 CrPC should not be allowed to prevent abuse of process, ensuring fair investigation procedures.
Constitutional courts can grant bail despite statutory restrictions when prolonged incarceration violates the right to a speedy trial under Article 21.
Point of Law : To meet the ends of justice, the door cannot be shut against the accused persons without giving opportunity to cross-examine the witness only after he came to know that in another sess....
The court emphasized the need for essential evidence to arrive at a just decision and discussed the exercise of discretion under Section 311 Cr.P.C. in light of relevant case law.
The essentiality of evidence for a just decision of the case should be the primary factor in deciding the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
