JUDGMENT :

01- ;kph }kjk ;g ;kfpdk fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; mi[k.M eftLVªsV] ckM+esj ds QkStnkjh eqdnek la[;k 91@2023 lqjs'kflag pkS/kjh cuke MkW vkj-vkj- pkS/kjh] vUrxZr /kkjk 133 lhvkj-ih-lh-] fu.kZ; fnukad 18-07-2023 ls O;fFkr gksdj ;g ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk 482 lhvkj-ih-lh- ds rgr izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
2- cgl ;kfpdk lquh xbZA
3- fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kfpdkdrkZ }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd bl U;k;ky; esa lh/ks gh /kkjk 482 lhvkj-ih-lh- dh dk;Zokgh vk{ksfir vkns'k fo:) dh tk ldrh gS fjohtu dk;Zokgh vyx ls dh tkuk vko';d ugha gSA ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk f'kdk;rdrkZ ds O;fDrxr fgr dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] dksbZ lkoZtfud fgr bl ekeys esa ugha gSA vkl&iM+kSl ds fdlh Hkh O;fDr;ksa dks fdlh izdkj dh U;wlsal ugha gks jgh gSA f'kdk;rdrkZ] ;kfpdkdrkZ ds ?kj ds lkeus fuokl ugha djrk gSA ;kfpdkdrkZ }kjk lEifRr dk O;kolkf;d iV~Vk izkIr dj ikWY;w'ku daVªksy cksMZ dh vuqefr ls fof/kor rjhds ls fDyfud pyk;k tk jgk gS] ftlls fdlh dks U;wlsal ugha gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vkns'k fof/kfo:) gksus ls fujLr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kfpdkdrkZ us vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"Vkar

1. (2013) 15 SCC 624 Urmila Devi Vs. Yudhvir Singh, 2. (2020) 7 SCC 695 D. Devaraja Vs. Owais Sabeer Hussain, 3. 1999 Cr.L.R (Raj) 506, G.B. Jain & Sons Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Anr. 4. (2005) 9 SCC 36 Kachrulal Bhagirath Agrawal And others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, 5. 1995 Supp (4) SCC 54 Vasant Manga Nikumba And Others Vs. Baburao Bhikanna Naidu, is'k fd;sA
4- fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd ;kfpdkdrkZ v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ls O;fFkr gS] rks mlds fy, /kkjk 397 lhvkj-ih-lh-ds rgr fjohtu dh tk ldrh gSA /kkjk 482 lhvkj-ih-lh-ds rgr lh/ks gh bl U;k;ky; esa dk;Zokgh ugha dh tk ldrhA dsoy ek= blh vk/kkj ij ;kfpdkdrkZ dh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa esjk /;ku ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar
AIR 1977 SC 2185 Amar Nath And others Vs. state of Haryana And others, dh rjQ /;ku vkdf"kZr fd;k vkSj lkFk gh ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd ;kfpdkdrkZ ds }kjk tks d`R; fd;k tk jgk gS] mlesa fjgk;'kh bykds esa O;kolkf;d dk;Z fd;k tk jgk gSA ftlls ekSds ij dkQh HkhM+ yxh jgrh gS] vkl&ikl ds bykdksa esa U;wlsal iSnk gksrk gSA bl vk/kkj ij v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vkns'k fof/klEer gksus ds vk/kkj ij iqf"V fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k vkSj vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa bl U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; Jagdish Vs The State of Rajasthan And others, (1997)CriLJ 3634 dh rjQ /;ku vkdf"kZr fd;kA
5- eSaus mi;qZDr rdksZa ij euu fd;k] izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk llEeku v/;;u fd;kA bl izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k ds fy, loZizFke bl iz'u ij fopkj fd;k tk jgk gS fd bl ekeys esa /kkjk 397 lhvkj-ih-lh- dh dk;Zokgh fd, cxSj lh/ks gh /kkjk 482 lhvkj-ih-lh- esa dk;Zokgh dh tk ldrh gS vFkok ughaA
6- /kkjk 482 lhvkj-ih-lh- ds izko/kku ds laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa ij fopkj fd;k tk jgk gSA
7- fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr iwoZ esa of.kZr AIR 1977 SC 2185 Amar Nath And others Vs. state of Haryana And others okys ekeys esa Hkh /kkjk 397 ¼2½ o 482 lhvkj-ih-lh- ds izko/kkuksa ij fopkj fd;k x;k vkSj bl ekeys esa vihykFkhZx.k dks leu fd;k x;k Fkk] ml vkns'k dks Interlocutory Order ugha ekuk x;k Fkk vkSj ml vkns'k dks /kkjk 397¼1½ ;k 482 lhvkj-ih-lh- ds rgr pqukSrh fn, tk ldus dk fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k x;k FkkA bl U;kf;d n`"Vkar ds iSjk la[;k 3 esa fuEukuqlkj fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k x;k %&

3. While we fully agree with the view taken by the learned Judge that where a revision to the High Court against the order of the Subordinate Judge is expressly barred under sub-section (2) of Section 397 of the 1973 Code the inherent powers contained in Section 482 would not be available to defeat the bar contained in Section 397(2). Section 482 of the 1973 Code contains the inherent powers of the Court and does not confer any new powers but preserves the powers which the High Court already possessed. A harmonious construction of Sections 397 and 482 would lead to the irresistible conclusion that where a pa