Back
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Somya Saxena D/o Alok Saxena – Appellant
Versus
National Medical Commission, through Chairman, New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.
1. Present intra-court appeal seeks to assail legality and validity of order dated 18.10.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby, appellant’s prayer for issuance of direction to the respondents to allow the appellant to complete her compulsory rotating internship from any medical college in Jaipur, has been rejected and writ petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed.
2. Facts of the case:
2.1 Quint essential facts relevant for adjudication of the controversy involved in this appeal are that the appellant appeared in NEET UG 2016 Examination and having secured requisite merit and rank, was admitted in Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka. Thereafter, the appellant, having completed her final year of MBBS course, was required to undergo one year compulsory rotating internship. The appellant ever since her admission in the medical college at Kolar, Karnataka was suffering from disease known as “Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura” and was undergoing treatment in the same medical college where she was pursuing her MBBS course. Later on, as is pleaded, appellant’s medical condition deteriorated resulting in complicatio
A High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226(2) requires that part of the cause of action arises within its territorial limits.
Point of Law : Territorial jurisdiction - Prior to Constitutional (Fifteenth Amendment Act, 1963, concept of cause of action was alien for adjudication of disputes by High Court under Article 226 of ....
High Court's jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 is contingent upon the presence of a cause of action within its territorial limits, as clarified by recent rulings.
Territorial jurisdiction of a High Court under Article 226(2) of the Constitution is determined by whether the cause of action, either in whole or in part, has arisen within its territorial limits.
The court emphasized that a dismissal must be proportionate to the misconduct and that procedural violations in disciplinary inquiries can invalidate the outcome.
The jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal must be established by where the cause of action arises, especially in online applications.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cause of action must arise within the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court for the exercise of power under Article 226 of the Consti....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
