SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1104

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Mangilal, S/o. Sh. Mohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Pradeep Shah, Mr. C.S. Rathore.
For the Respondent: Mr. Arun Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

1. By way of filing the instant Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C., challenge has been made to the judgment dated 28.05.2003 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Udaipur in Criminal appeal No.5/2001, whereby the learned appellate court affirmed the judgment dated 16.03.2001 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mavli, District Udaipur in Regular Criminal Case No.360/1996 convicting the petitioner for the offence under Sections 7(V) Rule 50(i) & 7(1) R/w 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and sentencing him to undergo six months’ rigorous imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.1000/-and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo 1 month’s SI.

2. Bereft of elaborate details, facts relevant and essential for disposal of the instant criminal revision are that on 25.03.1996 the Food Inspector inspected the shop of the petitioner situated in Village Laxmanpura, Panchayat Majavada, District Udaipur, where the petitioner was selling food articles. The petitioner was informed about the inspection of the shop, however, he did not show any licence. Upon a suspicion that the mustard

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top