PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Bhansali Dyeing, Proprietorship – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Energy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Since all the instant petitions involve a common controversy though with marginal variation in the contextual facts, therefore, for the purposes of the present analogous adjudication, the facts are being taken from the above-numbered S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8901/2023, while treating the same as a lead case; thus, the rival submissions of the parties and the observations of the Court, in the present order, would also be based, particularly, on the factual matrix of the lead case.
1.1 The prayer clauses of SBCWP Nos.8901/2023 & 18588/2019 read as under:-
“It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed and:-
a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 01.09.2022 in Petition Number 2024/2022 (Annexure-1) and 23.06.2023 in Petition Number 2060/2023 (Annexure-2) passed by Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (Respondent No 01) may kindly be quashed and set aside.
b) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the consequential order passed by the Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited on 20.09.2022 (Annexure-3) and any order passed by Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited or it
Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. State of Orissa & Ors.
Ashok Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Assistant Collector of Central Excise Vs. Dunlop India Ltd. & Ors.
Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department
Bihar State Electricity Board Vs Pulak Enterprises & Ors.
Chief Information Commissioner & Ors. Vs State of Manipur & Ors. (2011) 15 SCC 1
Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and others (2017) 14 SCC 80
Harbanslal Sahnia v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd.
Radha Krishna Industries Vs State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. (2021) 6 SCC 771
Sai Bhaskar Iron Ltd. Vs A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors. (2016) 9 SCC 134
SEBI vs. Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd.
Thansingh Nathmal & Ors. Vs. A.Majid
Vijendra Kumar Verma Vs. Public Service Commission, Uttarakhand & Ors.
Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of Trademarks Mumbai and Ors (1998) 8 SCC 1
The court established that consumers cannot be charged for interest/carrying costs due to DISCOMS' delayed payments, limiting the special fuel surcharge to the original principal amount only.
The term “Law” in the PPAs would include all applicable rules, regulations, orders, Notifications issued by an Indian Governmental Instrumentality and shall also include all rules, regulations, decis....
(1) Condition precedent for entertaining appeal under Section 125 of Electricity Act, 2003 is existence of a substantial question – A question of law which arises incidentally or collaterally and has....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the DVC could claim dues on the basis of differential amounts of charges in 2021, after the final tariffs were fixed in 2020. However, the DVC....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.