Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Non-Compliance on Counter Affidavits Draws Exemplary Costs Warning: Supreme Court in Gauri Maulekhi PIL
13 Mar 2026
SLPs Challenging PoP Idol Immersion Orders Disposed as Infructuous; Liberty to Assist Bombay HC: Supreme Court
13 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Bhansali Dyeing, Proprietorship – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Energy – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
1. Since all the instant petitions involve a common controversy though with marginal variation in the contextual facts, therefore, for the purposes of the present analogous adjudication, the facts are being taken from the above-numbered S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8901/2023, while treating the same as a lead case; thus, the rival submissions of the parties and the observations of the Court, in the present order, would also be based, particularly, on the factual matrix of the lead case.
1.1 The prayer clauses of SBCWP Nos.8901/2023 & 18588/2019 read as under:-
“It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed and:-
a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 01.09.2022 in Petition Number 2024/2022 (Annexure-1) and 23.06.2023 in Petition Number 2060/2023 (Annexure-2) passed by Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (Respondent No 01) may kindly be quashed a
The court established that consumers cannot be charged for interest/carrying costs due to DISCOMS' delayed payments, limiting the special fuel surcharge to the original principal amount only.
The term “Law” in the PPAs would include all applicable rules, regulations, orders, Notifications issued by an Indian Governmental Instrumentality and shall also include all rules, regulations, decis....
The Notification imposing Evacuation Facility Charges constitutes a change in law, entitling the affected party to compensation from that date.
Consumers are not entitled to voltage rebates if in arrears; however, amounts kept in abeyance do not constitute arrears for rebate eligibility under tariff provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article