Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Vipin Kumar S/o Sh. Krishan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
1. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 27.07.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13986/2021, whereby the writ petition preferred by the appellant-petitioner was dismissed.
2. Briefly, the facts noted for deciding the present appeal are that the appellant vied for the post of Nurse Grade-II notified for Non-TSP area pursuant to advertisement dated 30.05.2018. The appellant claimed bonus marks on the basis of experience he had gained during his stint as a Nurse under NRHM scheme in the State of Punjab.
3. In pursuance of an interim order in appellant’s earlier writ petition (being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12678/2018), an experience certificate dated 29.06.2018 indicating experience of three years eight months and ten days was issued to the appellant by the respondent No.3.
4. On the basis of experience certificate so issued, the appellant appli
The State Government has the discretion to extend weightage to a particular class serving in the State of Rajasthan only, and such discretion cannot be deemed discriminatory or arbitrary.
Entitlement to bonus marks under the Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 and the interpretation of the same in light of relevant case law.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the validity of the State of Rajasthan's policy to restrict the benefit of bonus marks to employees who have worked under different organization....
The experience certificate for services rendered outside the state cannot be considered for appointment and awarding bonus marks in a different state.
A litigant cannot claim distinction from a judicial decision relied upon for relief; subsequent judgments affecting the basis of entitlement invalidate previous claims.
Bonus marks under Rule 19 of the Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Services Rules, 1965 can only be granted to persons working on temporary/ ad-hoc basis or on contractual basis or through pla....
Experience gained with non-government entities does not qualify for bonus marks in merit-based appointments.
Object of providing bonus marks in recruitment process is to place candidates having sufficient experience of working.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article