IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, J.
Navdeep Singh Maan S/o Labh Singh Maan – Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8960 of 2018, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4997 of 2017
Decided On : 02-12-2023
Experience Certificate - Appointment Dispute - Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 - Article 14, 16, 21 of the Constitution of India - Satya Dev Bhagaur vs. State of Rajasthan (2022) 5 SCC 314, Vipin Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan (D.B. Special Application Writ No. 771/2023)
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought appointment as Nurse Grade-II in accordance with an advertisement. They were denied experience certificates by the respondents, leading to a dispute.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the experience certificate issued for services rendered in Punjab could not be counted for joining the post in Rajasthan. The bonus marks were awarded based on the services rendered in Rajasthan, and the services outside Rajasthan could not be considered for awarding bonus marks. Consequently, the court dismissed the petitions.
Issues: Dispute over the issuance of experience certificates and entitlement to appointment based on previous advertisements.
Ratio Decidendi: The experience certificate for services rendered outside Rajasthan could not be counted for joining the post in Rajasthan. Bonus marks were awarded based on services rendered in Rajasthan, and the services outside Rajasthan could not be considered for awarding bonus marks.
Final Decision: The petitions were dismissed, and all pending applications were disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, J.
1. Since both the instant petitions involve a common controversy though with marginal variation in the contextual facts, therefore, for the purposes of the present analogous adjudication, the facts are being taken from the above-numbered S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8960/2018, while treating the same as a lead case.
1.1. The prayer clauses of the instant petitions read as follows:
“It is therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that by an appropriate writ, order or direction your lordship may kindly be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition:
(a) The action of the respondents in not giving him experience certificate and denying him his rightful consideration for appointment in pursuance to advertisement dated 09.04.2018 (An.11) with all benefits on account of providing vertical reservation instead of horizontal reservation to women category aspirants in earlier advertisement may kindly be declared illegal, arbitrary and violative to Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
(b) The respondents may kindly be directed to issue experience certificate to the petitioner considering his appointment in pursuance to the advertisement dated 04.05.20074 (Ann.1) with all consequential benefits as available to the aspirants appointed in pursuance to advertisement dated 04.05.207 (Ann.1).
(c) Any other appropriate order which is deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be also passed.
(d) The petitioner may kindly be allowed the cost of writ petition.”
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4997/2017:
“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that Your Lordship may kindly be pleased to allow this writ petition and by an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby:
(i) The action of the respondents while not providing appointment to the petitioners on the post of GNM in pursuance to the first phase advertisement dated 04.05.2007 (Ann.1) with all benefits on account of providing vertical reservation instead of horizontal reservation to women category aspirants may kindly be declared illegal, arbitrary and violative to Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
(ii) The respondents may kindly be directed to provide appointment to the petitioners in pursuance to the advertisement dated 04.05.2007 (Ann.1) with all consequential benefits as availed by the aspirants appointed in pursuance to advertisement dated 04.05.2007.
(iii) Any other appropriate order which is deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be also passed.
(iv) The petitioners may kindly be allowed the cost of writ petition.”
2. Brief facts of the case, as placed before this Court by learned counsel of the petitioner, are that the respondents issued an advertisement dated 09.04.2018 for recruitment on the post of Nurse Grade-II in accordance with the Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 for almost 4155 vacancies.
2.1 The bone of contention in the present case is that the petitioners being eligible for the said post and aspiring to apply for the same, approached the respondents by way of application seeking issuance of requisite experience certificate, towards the services rendered by the petitioners, but the respondents denied the issuance thereof.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondents were required to accord appointment to petitioners in pursuance of the advertisement dated 04.05.2007 as directed by this Hon’ble Court in an earlier round of the litigation vide order dated 19.08.2008 passed in S.B.C.W.P. No. 4040/2007 with notional benefits. Therefore, the respondents were required to grant appointment to the petitioners on the post of Nurse Grade II in pursuance of the first phase advertisement dated 04.05.2007 and in that backdrop, the petitioners are entitled for issuance of the experience certificate towards the services rendered by them from 04.05.20
The experience certificate for services rendered outside the state cannot be considered for appointment and awarding bonus marks in a different state.
The State Government has the discretion to extend weightage to a particular class serving in the State of Rajasthan only, and such discretion cannot be deemed discriminatory or arbitrary.
Entitlement to bonus marks under the Rajasthan Medical and Health Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 and the interpretation of the same in light of relevant case law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to consider experience certificates and the principles of natural justice in determining eligibility for the post of Laboratory Ass....
Courts would be slow in interfering in policy matters unless policy is found to be palpably discriminatory and arbitrary.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.