Back
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Raj Kanwar W/o Shri Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Since both the writ petitions arise out of a common judgment, therefore they are being heard and decided finally by this common order.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The present writ petitions have been filed against the order dated 24.10.1997 passed by the Commissioner (Colonization), Bikaner and the order dated 30.06.1999 passed by the Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer, whereby the revision petitions filed by the petitioners were dismissed.
4. Briefly, the facts noted in the present writ petitions are that the petitioners, being the bonafide agriculturists and residents of State of Rajasthan by way of filing an application applied for allotment of land as per Rule 13-A of the Rajasthan Colonization (Allotment and Sale of the Government Land in the Indira Gandhi Canal Colony Area), Rules, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rules of 1975’). Considering the petitioners eligible for allotment of land, the respondents vide orders dated 29.12.1993 & 25.08.1993 allowed the application of the petitioners and allotted 24.5 Bighas and 25 Bighas of land to the petitioners respectively.
5. After allotment of the land, the petitioners were handed over the possession
The central legal point established in the judgment is the correct interpretation and application of the Rajasthan Colonization Rules, 1975, particularly regarding the definition of 'landless person'....
The court upheld the dismissal of the appellant's writ petition, finding no violations of the Rajasthan Colonisation Rules and affirming the finality of prior allotments.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that allotments obtained by misrepresentation or fraud can be cancelled without limitation, and such allotments do not confer any title over the pr....
The court established that long-standing land allotments should not be canceled without substantial justification, emphasizing the need for fair treatment of agriculturalists.
The court upheld the validity of land allotment under the Rajasthan Colonization Rules, confirming the authority of the Additional Commissioner to reject cancellation applications based on existing n....
The main legal point established is the authority's power to review its own order and the applicability of revenue laws as supplemental provisions.
The main legal point established is that the power to cancel land allotment must be exercised within a reasonable time, and khatedari rights cannot be withdrawn after their conferment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
