SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1685

VIJAY BISHNOI
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Indraj – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Joshi, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-State being aggrieved with the order dated 29.08.2019 passed by the Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer (for short 'the Board of Revenue') in revision petition No.3881/2009 whereby, while accepting the revision filed by the respondents, the Board of Revenue has ordered for closure of the proceedings initiated against them under the provisions of Rule 22 (3) of the Rajasthan Colonization(Sale And Allotment of Government Land In Indra Gandhi Canal Area) Rules, 1975 (for short 'the Rules of 1975')-

2. Brief facts of the case are that the predecessor of applicant Indraj had applied for permanent allotment of land under the provisions of Rules of 1975. The said application came to be rejected by the allotting authority in the year 1975 on the ground that the applicant was not bonafide resident of State of Rajasthan prior to 1.4.1975. The applicant Indraj had preferred an appeal before the appellate authority which came to be dismissed on 31.05.1976. Thereafter, again he preferred a revision petition before the Board of Revenue which also came to be dismissed in the year 1977. Then applicant Indraj had preferred a writ petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top