Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, MUNNURI LAXMAN
Sarvesh Pradhan S/o Shri Roop Narayan Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India claiming the following reliefs:
(a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the proviso to Rule 56 of Rajasthan Civil Services Rules 1951 as inserted by amendment dated 31.03.2016 as it relates to superannuation in respect of MBBS Degree holder officer of the Rajasthan Medical and Health Service may kindly be declared discriminatory and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and same be declared as ultra vires and the respondents may kindly be directed to amend/include Medical Officers (Dental) holding BDS Degree in the proviso so that their age of superannuation shall also be 62 years.
(b) That amendment in the Rule 56 of Rajasthan Service rules by insertion of proviso notification dated 31.03.2016 may kindly be quashed so far as it relates to extension of age of MBBS degree holder Medical Officers and the words “MBBS Degree holder” may be deleted being violative of 14 & 16 of the constitution of India.
(c) Alternatively, the respondent State Government may be directed to furt
The main legal point established in the judgment is the prohibition of discriminatory treatment based on qualifications, as it violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
The amendment to Rule 56 of the Rajasthan Civil Services Rules, allowing different retirement ages for MBBS and BDS degree holders, was found discriminatory and unconstitutional under Articles 14 and....
Discrimination in the enhancement of the age of superannuation based on the type of medical degree held is in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Amendments to age of superannuation regulations for doctors uphold administrative authority; no vested rights to administrative posts post-62 years established, ensuring compliance with constitutiona....
Once it is found that differentiation is based on reasonable classification, decision cannot be held to be violative of principles of equality enshrined under Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of In....
The age of superannuation is a matter of executive policy, and courts should not interfere in such decisions unless they are shown to be ex facie arbitrary or perverse.
Reasonable classification under Article 14 allows differentiation in retirement age based on distinct roles and qualifications between medical and non-medical teaching cadres.
Classification of retirement age between medical and non-medical teachers is justified under Article 14 as it is based on reasonable differentiation of roles and qualifications.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
