Sumer Singh S/o Ram Kishore vs Union Of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Raj) 70

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Sumer Singh S/o Ram Kishore – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Kiran for Mr. Vinod Choudhary
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, Dy. SG a/w Mr. Uttam Singh Rajpurohit

ORDER :

1. This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India claiming the following reliefs:

“It is therefore most humbly and respectfully prayed that this rate petition me kindly be allowed with cost and;

i. By an appropriate writ order or direction the impugned order dated 29.12.2022 (Annexure-3) passed by the respondents whereby, offer of appointment on the post of SI/GD dated 22.10.2022 (Anx-01) may kindly be quashed and set aside.

ii. By an appropriate writ order or direction the impugned letter dated 07.02.2023 (Anx-04) passed by the respondents whereby, the request to reconsider the cancellation of offer of appointment may kindly be set aside and quashed.

iii. By an appropriate order or direction the respondent me kindly be directed to reissuance of offer of appointment with all consequential benefits.

iv. Any other appropriate rate order or direction with this honorable court deems just and proper may kindly be passed in favour of petitioner.”

2. Brief facts of the case, as placed before this Court by learned counsel for the petitioner, are that an advertisement was issued by the Staff Selection Commission for the post of Sub-Inspector (General

Click Here to Read the rest of this document