Kashi Ram Yadav vs Commissioner, Kendriya Vidhyalaya Sangthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Kashi Ram Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Kendriya Vidhyalaya Sangthan – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioner's appointment was not completed timely due to extensions. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding covid-19 impact and travel issues presented. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court observed petitioner's lack of due diligence in joining. (Para 6 , 7)
4. decision reaffirming tribunal's order against the petitioner. (Para 8)
5. dismissal of writ petition affirmed. (Para 9)

JUDGMENT

[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)--This writ petition is directed against the order dated 27.09.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short, "the Tribunal"] in OA No.2125/2021.

2. The brief facts of the case which are required to be noticed are as follows:

2.1. The petitioner was offered appointment to the post of Senior Secretariat Assistant [SSA] in the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Ooty, via letter dated 20.01.2020. The petitioner was informed that he had to join his post on or before 10.02.2020.

2.2. Concededly, the petitioner did not join the post by the date indicated in the letter of appointment.

2.3. The petitioner, admittedly, sought an extension which was granted to him up-until 31.03.2020, pursuant to hi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTRAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGHKashi Ram Yadav – AppellantVersusCommissioner, Kendriya Vidhyalaya Sangthan – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Kashi Ram Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Kendriya Vidhyalaya Sangthan – Respondent