ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur, Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Rajeev Chaturvedi S/o. D. S. Chaturvedi – Respondent
ORDER :
1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the impugned orders dated 14.06.2022 and 13.04.2023 passed by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (for short ‘the NCDRC’).
2. By way of passing the aforesaid orders, the NCDRC has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioners in default for want of prosecution. Subsequently, a restoration application filed by the petitioners against the order dated 14.06.2022 has also been rejected by the NCDRC vide order dated 13.04.2023.
Submissions by the petitioners:-
3. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents filed a complaint case No.37/2017 against the petitioners before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (for short ‘the State Commission’) and the same was allowed vide order dated 27.09.2018 and it has been held that the complainant is entitled to get Rs.46,40,400/- along with interest @9% interest from the date of each deposit. It is also held that the complainant is further entitled to get Rs. 2,00,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.50,000/- as cost of the proceedings with interest @ 9% from the date of order. Counsel subm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.