SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Magnum International Trading Company Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Dhawan – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal against a single judge's order (Para 1 , 2)
2. background of the agreement and complaint (Para 3 , 4 , 6)
3. jurisdiction issues raised by appellant (Para 7 , 10 , 11)
4. writ petition and stay application refusal (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. court's stance on alternative remedies (Para 21 , 29 , 30)
6. dismissal of petition with costs (Para 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. Magnum International Trading Company Private Limited, a company engaged in business of real estate development, has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 13.11.2019 (hereafter `the impugned order'), passed by the learned Single, whereby the learned Single Judge had declined to entertain the petition on the ground of existence of an equally efficacious alternative remedy.

2. The appellant had filed a writ petition challenging certain orders passed by the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereafter `the NCDRC') in Consumer Case No.42 of 2018 captioned Vikas Dhawan & Anr. v. Magnum International Trading Company Private Limited. The appellant contends that the proceedings before the learned NCDRC are without jurisdiction, inter alia, on the ground that the subje

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top