DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Magnum International Trading Company Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Dhawan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against a single judge's order (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of the agreement and complaint (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. jurisdiction issues raised by appellant (Para 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. writ petition and stay application refusal (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's stance on alternative remedies (Para 21 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. dismissal of petition with costs (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. Magnum International Trading Company Private Limited, a company engaged in business of real estate development, has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 13.11.2019 (hereafter `the impugned order'), passed by the learned Single, whereby the learned Single Judge had declined to entertain the petition on the ground of existence of an equally efficacious alternative remedy.
2. The appellant had filed a writ petition challenging certain orders passed by the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereafter `the NCDRC') in Consumer Case No.42 of 2018 captioned Vikas Dhawan & Anr. v. Magnum International Trading Company Private Limited. The appellant contends that the proceedings before the learned NCDRC are without jurisdiction, inter alia, on the ground that the subje
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.