IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
REKHA BORANA, J.
Purushotam, S/o. Heera Lal - Appellant
Versus
Kayumdeen, S/o. Babusiya & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1170 of 2023
Decided On : 19-02-2024
Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation Assessment - Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - [166, 173] - The court discussed the assessment of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, specifically focusing on the loss of future earnings due to permanent disability. The court referred to the guidelines and general principles established by the Hon'ble Apex court in the cases of Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar & Anr. (2011) 1 SCC 343 and Sarnam Singh vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors., (2023) 8 SCC 193 to determine the impact of permanent disability on earning capacity. The court emphasized that the disability percentage in the certificate is not always congruent to loss of future earnings and may differ based on factors such as age, nature of profession, etc. The court modified the compensation amount based on the assessment of loss of future earnings and medical expenses.
Fact of the Case:
The claimant-appellant sought enhancement of the compensation amount under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, after sustaining injuries in a motor vehicle accident. The learned Tribunal had awarded a compensation of Rs.27,23,406/-, which the claimant sought to increase.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the impact of the claimant's permanent disability on his future earning capacity and assessed the loss of future earnings at 50%, modifying the compensation amount to Rs.35,26,978/-. The court also allowed the medical expenses not considered by the Tribunal.
Issues: The primary issue was whether the learned Tribunal rightly assessed the loss of future earnings despite the disability certificates reflecting higher percentages of disability.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the guidelines and general principles established by the Hon'ble Apex court in previous cases to determine the impact of permanent disability on earning capacity. It emphasized that the disability percentage in the certificate is not always congruent to loss of future earnings and may differ based on factors such as age, nature of profession, etc.
Final Decision: The present appeal was allowed, and the compensation amount was modified to Rs.35,26,978/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition.
ORDER :
1. The present civil miscellaneous appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘the Act of 1988’) has been preferred by the claimant-appellant seeking enhancement of the compensation amount as awarded vide judgment dated 12.04.2023 passed in MAC Case No.120/2021 by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Merta whereby the claim petition filed by the claimant-appellant under Section 166 of the Act of 1988 was partly allowed and the claimant was held entitled to a compensation of Rs.27,23,406/- with interest @ 9% per annum.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 22.11.2020, the claimant-appellant, was going on a motorcycle bearing registration No.RJ01-SL-2092 from Padukala towards Ajmer. At about 04:30 pm when he reached near Tehla Sarhad, he was hit from front side by offending vehicle i.e. Bolero bearing registration No.RJ05-UA-5675, being driven rashly and negligently on wrong side by its driver/owner respondent No.1, as a result of which, the claimant sustained injuries. The offending vehicle, on the date of accident, was insured with respondent No.2 – Insurance Company.
3. The claimant-appellant preferred a claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.1,39,34,960/-.
4. The learned Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence available on the record and after hearing the counsel for the parties, assessed the annual income of the claimant-appellant to be Rs.3,79,314/- and awarded a sum of Rs.27,23,406/- as compensation in favour of the claimant-appellant, the break-up of which is as under :
| Annual Income (less tax) | Rs.3,79,314/- |
| Future Prospects – 25% (3,79,314x25/100) | Rs.94,828.50/- |
|
| Rs.4,74,142.50/- |
| Multiplier to be applied – 14 (4,74,143x14) | Rs.66,38,002/- |
| Loss of earnings – 40% (66,38,002x40/100) [A] | Rs.26,55,201/- |
| Lumpsum Compensation for physical & mental agony, transportation, hospital expenses etc. [B] | Rs.50,000/- |
| Medical expenses (qua medical bills Exh.61-68, 94-96 and 99) [C] | Rs.18,205/- |
| Total Compensation [A+B+C] | Rs.27,23,406/- |
Learned Tribunal along with the aforementioned compensation also awarded interest @9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition.
5. The claimant-appellant has preferred the present appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation amount as awarded vide judgment & award dated 12.04.2023.
6. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in the aforesaid accident, the appellant sustained 60% temporary physical impairment in his right upper limb as per the disability certificate dated 27.06.2022 (Exh.17) and 70% disability as per the disability certificate dated 29.10.2022 (Exh.108), but the learned Tribunal assessed the said disability only to be 40% and awarded a meagre compensation of Rs.27,23,406/- only while determining the loss of future earnings. He further submitted that amount qua medical bills (Exh.23-53, 55-60, 69-93 and 100-106) has erroneously not been awarded by the tribunal whereas the same ought to have been considered while computing amount of compensation. He therefore, prayed for modification of the impugned judgment and for enhancement of the amount of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal.
7. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company submits that the interest rate as awarded by the learned Tribunal @ 9% is on a higher side and deserves reduction. Counsel further submits that alleged medical bills were not supported by any prescription and hence, the same were rightly not considered while computing the amount of compensation.
8. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
9. The primary issue under consideration in the present matter is - Whether the learned Tribunal rightly assessed the loss of future earnings @ 40% despite the disability certificates dated 27.06.2022 and 29.10.2022 reflecting
Sarnam Singh vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.
The assessment of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for loss of future earnings due to permanent disability is not solely based on the disability percentage in the certificate and may ....
Compensation for injuries must be based on evidence of actual income loss and the impact of disabilities on earning capacity.
Injury in accident – Quantum of compensation must be commensurate with degree of disability suffered by victim.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for just and realistic compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, considering the impact of permanent disability on the claimant's ....
The judgment affirms that functional disability and future compensation prospects are critical in assessing damages for injury in accident cases, rejecting arbitrary reductions in disability assessme....
The main legal point established is that the assessment of compensation in motor accident cases should consider the impact of permanent disability on the claimant's earning capacity, and the percenta....
The court ruled that income tax returns are essential for determining compensation, and notional income must reflect actual earnings.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of compensation for loss of future earnings based on the impact of permanent disability on earning capacity, and the application ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.