SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI, B.V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.
T.J. Parameshwarappa @ Parameshwarappa @ J.T. Parameshwarappa @ Talalkena Gowdra Parameshwarappa – Appellant
Versus
The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 8598-8599 of 2022, SLP (C) Nos. 11730-11731 of 2021
Decided On : 18-11-2022
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 166 – Injury in accident – Quantum of compensation – Amount of compensation reduced by High Court from Rs.21,08,400/- to Rs.7,37,604/- with 6% interest – Appellant-claimant was travelling in Tanker Lorry as a Cleaner – Driver of tanker lorry drove the same in a rash and negligent manner and with high speed – During treatment, he underwent surgery of both legs and rod and screws were inserted – He was hospitalized for thirty-six days cumulatively – There was 54% disability despite treatment – As claimant sustained comminuted fracture of tibia bones of both legs, whole-body disability assessed at 30% – Towards loss of future amenities and towards loss of income during laid up period for a period of twelve months compensation is enhanced – Judgment and award passed by High Court modified by enhancing award of compensation to appellant from Rs.7,37,604/- to Rs.11,67,405/- which shall carry 6% interest from date of filing of claim petition till realization. (Paras 3, 10, 11, 12 and 13)
Facts of the case:
In an accident that occurred on 15.05.2015 in which Appellant-claimant was injured. Being aggrieved by the reduction in total compensation by the High Court from Rs.21,08,400/- to Rs.7,37,604/- with interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of petition till its realization, injured-claimant has filed present appeals. Compensation awarded by Tribunal was over and above what was sought by appellant-claimant in claim petition i.e., Rs.20,00,000/-.
Findings of Court:
The amount shall be deposited within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment. On deposit of the said amount, the Tribunal shall deposit a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- in any nationalized bank for a period of five years. Appellant shall be entitled to draw periodical interest on the said deposit. The balance amount shall be paid to appellant herein.
Result : Appeals allowed in part.
JUDGMENT :
B.V. NAGARATHNA, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals assail the correctness of the judgment and award passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in M.F.A. No. 48 of 2017 connected with M.F.A. No. 7972 of 2016 (MV) dated 16.10.2020. M.F.A. No. 48 of 2017 was filed by the insurer-New India Assurance Co. Ltd. while M.F.A. No. 7972 of 2016 (MV) was filed by the insured claimant, both being aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 16.09.2016 passed by the Ist Addl. Senior Civil Judge and IVth MACT at Chitradurga in MVC No. 1091 of 2015. By the said judgment and award, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal” for the sake of convenience) awarded a sum of Rs. 21,08,400/- (Rupees Twenty-one lakhs eight thousand and four hundred only) with interest at 8% p.a. from the date of filing of the claim petition till date of deposit. This was in respect of an accident that occurred on 15.05.2015 in which the appellant-claimant was injured. Being aggrieved by the reduction in the total compensation by the High Court from Rs. 21,08,400/- to Rs. 7,37,604/- with interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date of petition till its realization, the injured-claimant has filed these appeals.
3. It is no longer in dispute that on 15.05.2015 at about 03:35 p.m. appellant-claimant was travelling in the Tanker Lorry bearing No. KA-01-AG-2266 as a cleaner from Kidlike to Hassan along with driver P. Jagadeesh. Near the RTO Office, Chitradurga, on NH-4 flyover, the driver of the tanker lorry drove the same in a rash and negligent manner and with high speed and dashed into the hind portion of another lorry bearing No. KA-16B-6247, as a result of which, appellantclaimant sustained comminuted fracture of tibia bones of both legs and other injuries on his body. He was shifted to B.M.C. Hospital and Research Centre, Chitradurga where he took treatment as an inpatient from 15.05.2015 to 13.06.2015 and thereafter took followup treatment as an outpatient. During treatment, he underwent surgery of both legs and rod and screws were inserted.
4. It is contended by the appellant that as a result of the accident he became permanently disabled and due to fracture of tibia bones of both legs and other injuries, he is unable to discharge his duties as a cleaner in the tanker lorry and hence, he has suffered both financially and physically. That he is also unable to perform his daily routine activity as he has sustained permanent disability. That he was working as a cleaner in a tanker lorry and was earning Rs. 18,000/- per month and due to the disability, he is unable to earn any income. He therefore, filed the claim petition seeking compensation of Rs. 20 lakhs on account of the injuries sustained by him in the road traffic accident. On contest, the Tribunal by its judgment and award dated 16.09.2016, awarded a sum of Rs. 21,08,400/- together with interest at 8% p.a. from the date of petition till date of deposit, under the following heads:
| S. No. | Description | Amount |
| 1. | Pain and suffering | Rs. 5,00,000/- |
| 2. | Medical and incidental Expenses | Rs. 4,00,000/- |
| 3. | Permanent disability (40% of Rs. 6,500 x 12 x 17) | Rs. 5,30,400/- |
| 4. | Future Medical Expenses | Rs. 2,00,000/- |
| 5. | Conveyance and attendant Charges | Rs. 2,00,000/- |
| 6. | Future Prospects (12 Months x 6,500) | Rs. 78,000/- |
| 7. | Marriage prospects | Rs. 2,00,000/- |
| Total | Rs. 21,08,400/- |
In fact, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was over and above what was sought by the appellant-claimant in the claim petition i.e. Rs. 20,00,000/-.
5. Being aggrieved by the said award, both the insurer as well as insured claimant filed the aforementioned appeals before the High Court. The High Court noted that the claimant had suffered lacerated wound over his forehead and fracture of mid 1/3rd tibia of right and
Injury in accident – Quantum of compensation must be commensurate with degree of disability suffered by victim.
The main legal point established is that the assessment of compensation in motor accident cases should consider the impact of permanent disability on the claimant's earning capacity, and the percenta....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of compensation in injury cases, considering factors such as permanent disability, loss of future earnings, pain and sufferings, and....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for just and realistic compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, considering the impact of permanent disability on the claimant's ....
Permanent functional disability significantly impacts compensation for loss of income, and Courts must prioritize accurate income assessment over mere percentage disability.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to assess loss of earning capacity and future medical expenses in cases of permanent disability to ensure just compensation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of compensation for permanent disability under the Motor Vehicles Act, considering the impact on the claimant's earning capacity and....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.